[1]刘明阳?赵晨?郝伟?贾海波?于波.冠状动脉生物可吸收支架临床应用最新进展[J].心血管病学进展,2023,(7):649.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2023.07.017]
 LIU Mingyang,ZHAO Chen,HAO Wei,et al.Clinical Application of Coronary Bioabsorbable Scaffolds[J].Advances in Cardiovascular Diseases,2023,(7):649.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2023.07.017]
点击复制

冠状动脉生物可吸收支架临床应用最新进展()
分享到:

《心血管病学进展》[ISSN:51-1187/R/CN:1004-3934]

卷:
期数:
2023年7期
页码:
649
栏目:
综述
出版日期:
2023-07-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical Application of Coronary Bioabsorbable Scaffolds
作者:
刘明阳?赵晨?郝伟?贾海波?于波
(哈尔滨医科大学附属第二医院心血管内科 教育部心肌缺血重点实验室,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150081)
Author(s):
LIU MingyangZHAO ChenHAO WeiJIA HaiboYu Bo
(Department of Cardiology,The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University;The Key Laboratory of Myocardial Ischemia ,Chinese Ministry of Education,Harbin 150081,Heilongjiang,China)
关键词:
生物可吸收支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗支架血栓血管内影像学
Keywords:
Bioresorbable scaffoldPercutaneous coronary interventionStent thrombosisIntravascular imaging
DOI:
10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2023.07.017
摘要:
生物可吸收支架作为一种创新性的支架产品,由于其植入后可完全吸收,进而可恢复血管正常生理功能,被誉为冠状动脉介入治疗领域的“第四次革命”。在上市之初便被寄予厚望,然而先前的临床效用结果并未达到其预期。近年来,大量的临床数据为新一代生物可吸收支架的研发和应用提供了许多宝贵的经验。现总结既往研究经验,并就生物可吸收支架的最新研发进展及临床应用进行综述。
Abstract:
Bioresorbable scaffold,as an innovative stent product,has been hailed as the “fourth revolution” in the field of coronary artery intervention therapy due to its ability to be entirely absorbed and restore normal vascular function after implantation. At the beginning of its listing,high expectations were placed,but previous clinical efficacy results did not meet its expectations. In recent years,a wealth of clinical data has provided valuable experience for the development and application of next-generation bioresorbable scaffolds. This article aims to summarize previous research findings and review the latest development and clinical application of bioresorbable scaffolds

参考文献/References:

[1] 中国心血管健康与疾病报告编写组,胡盛寿. 中国心血管健康与疾病报告2021概要[J]. 中国循环杂志,2022,37(6):553-578.

[2] Giustino G,Colombo A,Camaj A,et al. Coronary in-stent restenosis:JACC state-of-the-art review[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,2022,80(4):348-372.

[3] Liu Y,Xiao D,Wu Y,et al. Bioresorbable scaffolds vs. drug-eluting stents for patients with myocardial infarction:A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials[J]. Front Cardiovasc Med,2022,9:974957.

[4] Jinnouchi H,Torii S,Sakamoto A,et al. Fully bioresorbable vascular scaffolds:lessons learned and future directions[J]. Nat Rev Cardiol,2019,16(5):286-304.

[5] Byrne RA,Alfonso F,Schneider S,et al. Prospective,randomized trial of bioresorbable scaffolds vs. everolimus-eluting stents in patients undergoing coronary stenting for myocardial infarction:the Intracoronary Scaffold Assessment a Randomized evaluation of Absorb in Myocardial Infarction (ISAR-Absorb MI) trial[J]. Eur Heart J,2019,40(2):167-176.

[6] Kereiakes DJ,Ellis SG,Metzger DC,et al. Clinical outcomes before and after complete everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold resorption:five-year follow-up from the ABSORB Ⅲ trial[J]. Circulation,2019,140(23):1895-1903.

[7] R?ber L,Yamaji K,Kelb?k H,et al. Five-year clinical outcomes and intracoronary imaging findings of the COMFORTABLE AMI trial:randomized comparison of biodegradable polymer-based biolimus-eluting stents with bare-metal stents in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction[J]. Eur Heart J,2019,40(24):1909-1919.

[8] Gomez‐Lara J,Oyarzabal L,Ortega‐Paz L,et al. Coronary endothelium‐dependent vasomotor function after drug‐eluting stent and bioresorbable scaffold implantation[J]. J Am Heart Assoc,2021,10(22):e022123.

[9] Omar WA,Kumbhani DJ. The current literature on bioabsorbable stents:a review[J]. Curr Atheroscler Rep,2019,21(12):54.

[10] Sotomi Y,Suwannasom P,Serruys PW,et al. Possible mechanical causes of scaffold thrombosis:insights from case reports with intracoronary imaging[J]. EuroIntervention,2017,12(14):1747-1756.

[11] Timmers L,Stella PR,Agostoni P. Very late bioresorbable vascular scaffold thrombosis following discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy[J]. Eur Heart J,2015, 36(6):393.

[12] Campos CM,Caixeta A,Franken M,et al. Risk and timing of clinical events according to diabetic status of patients treated with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus everolimus-eluting stent:2-year results from a propensity score matched comparison of ABSORB EXTEND and SPIRIT trials.[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2018,91(3):387-395.

[13] Ali ZA,Serruys PW,Kimura T,et al. 2-year outcomes with the Absorb bioresorbable scaffold for treatment of coronary artery disease:a systematic review and meta-analysis of seven randomised trials with an individual patient data substudy[J]. Lancet,2017,390(10096):760-772.

[14] Yamaji K,Ueki Y,Souteyrand G,et al. Mechanisms of Very Late Bioresorbable Scaffold Thrombosis:the INVEST registry[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,2017,70(19):2330-2344.

[15] Serruys PW,Chevalier B,Dudek D,et al. A bioresorbable everolimus-eluting scaffold versus a metallic everolimus-eluting stent for ischaemic heart disease caused by de-novo native coronary artery lesions (ABSORB Ⅱ):an interim 1-year analysis of clinical and procedural secondary outcomes from a randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet,2015,385(9962):43-54.

[16] Stone GW,Abizaid A,Onuma Y,et al. Effect of technique on outcomes following bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation:analysis from the ABSORB trials[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,2017,70(23):2863-2874.

[17] Otsuka F,Pacheco E,Perkins LE,et al. Long-Term Safety of an Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold and the Cobalt-Chromium XIENCE V Stent in a Porcine Coronary Artery Model[J]. Circ Cardiovasc Interv,2014,7(3):330-342.

[18] Xu B,Yang Y,Han Y,et al. Comparison of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds and metallic stents:three-year clinical outcomes from the ABSORB China randomised trial[J]. EuroIntervention,2018,14(5):e554-e561.

[19] Gallinoro E,Almendarez M,Alvarez-Velasco R,et al. Bioresorbable stents:Is the game over?[J]. Int J Cardiol,2022,361:20-28.

[20] Masiero G, Rodinò G, Matsuda J, et al. Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffold Technologies[J]. Cardiol Clin, 2020, 38(4):589-599.

[21] Stone GW,Kimura T,Gao R,et al. Time-varying outcomes with the absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold during 5-year follow-up:a systematic meta-analysis and individual patient data pooled study[J]. JAMA Cardiol,2019,4(12):1261-1269.

[22] Felix C, Vlachojannis G, IJsselmuiden A, et al. Potentially increased incidence of scaffold thrombosis in patients treated with Absorb BVS who terminated DAPT before 18 months[J]. EuroIntervention,2017,13(2):e177-e184.

[23] Azzalini L,Ellis SG,Kereiakes DJ,et al. Optimal dual antiplatelet therapy duration for bioresorbable scaffolds:an individual patient data pooled analysis of the ABSORB trials[J]. EuroIntervention,2021,17(12):e981-e988.

[24] Kerkmeijer LKM,Renkens MRL,Tijssen RYG,et al. Long-term clinical outcomes of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds versus everolimus-eluting stents:final five-year results of the AIDA randomised clinical trial[J]. EuroIntervention,2022,17(16):1340-1347.

[25] Han Y,Xu B,Fu G,et al. A randomized trial comparing the neovas sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold and metallic everolimus-eluting stents[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv,2018,11(3):260-272.

[26] Wang X,Li Y,Fu G,et al. Three‐year clinical outcomes of the novel sirolimus‐eluting bioresorbable scaffold for the treatment of de novo coronary artery disease:A prospective patient‐level pooled analysis of NeoVas trials[J]. Catheter Cardio Interv,2023,101(6):967-972.

[27] Wu Y,Yin J,Chen J,et al. Final report of the 5-year clinical outcomes of the XINSORB bioresorbable sirolimus-eluting scaffold in the treatment of single de novo coronary lesions in a first-in-human study[J]. Ann Transl Med,2020,8(18):1162.

[28] Wu Y,Yao Z,Yin J,et al. Three-year clinical outcomes of a sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold (XINSORB) and a metallic stent to treat coronary artery stenosis[J]. Ann Transl Med,2020,8(22):1489.

[29] Song L,Sun Z,Guan C,et al. First‐in‐man study of a thinner‐strut sirolimus‐eluting bioresorbable scaffold (FUTURE‐I):Three‐year clinical and imaging outcomes[J]. Catheter Cardio Inte,2020,95Suppl 1:648-657.

[30] Song L,Xu B,Chen Y,et al. Thinner strut sirolimus-eluting brs versus EES in patients with coronary artery disease[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv,2021,14(13):1450-1462.

[31] Chevalier B,Abizaid A,Carrié D,et al. Clinical and angiographic outcomes with a novel radiopaque sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold[J]. Circ Cardiovasc Interv,2019,12(6):e007283.

[32] Koltowski L,Tomaniak M,Ochijewicz D,et al. Third-generation sirolimus‐eluting bioresorbable tyrocore scaffold implantation in patients with ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction:baseline and 6-month OCT and clinical outcomes-a FANTOM STEMI pilot study[J]. Cardiovasc Drug Ther,2023,doi:10.1007/s10557-023-07429-0. Online ahead of print.

[33] Wlodarczak A,Lanocha M,Jastrzebski A,et al. Early outcome of magnesium bioresorbable scaffold implantation in acute coronary syndrome-the initial report from the Magmaris‐ACS registry[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2019,93(5):E287-E292.

[34] Verheye S,Wlodarczak A,Montorsi P,et al. BIOSOLVE‐IV‐registry:Safety and performance of the Magmaris scaffold:12‐month outcomes of the first cohort of 1,075 patients[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2021,98(1):E1-E8.

[35] Ortega-Paz L,Brugaletta S,Gomez-Lara J,et al. Magnesium-based resorbable scaffold vs permanent metallic sirolimus-eluting stent in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction:3-year results of the MAGSTEMI randomised controlled trial[J]. EuroIntervention,2022,18(5):e389-e396.

[36] Gao RL,Xu B,Sun Z,et al. First-in-human evaluation of a novel ultrathin sirolimus-eluting iron bioresorbable scaffold:3-year outcomes of the IBS-FIM trial[J]. EuroIntervention,2023,EIJ-D-22-00919. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00919. Online ahead of print.

相似文献/References:

[1]韩培天 魏晓岩 杜彬彬 张津宁 王文州 郭艳娇 张克成 李春彦 李文慧.心肌缺血时间对STEMI患者急诊PCI术后早期左室舒张功能的影响及相关因素分析[J].心血管病学进展,2020,(6):660.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2020.06.024]
 HAN Pei-tian,WEI Xiaoyan,DU Binbin,et al.Effect of Myocardial Ischemia Duration on Early Left Ventricular Diastolic Function in STEMI Patients After Emergency PCI and Analysis of Related Factors[J].Advances in Cardiovascular Diseases,2020,(7):660.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2020.06.024]
[2]贺彩红 荣晶晶 潘宏伟.定量血流分数在急性心肌梗死中的应用进展[J].心血管病学进展,2021,(4):347.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2021.04.014]
 HE Caihong,RONG Jingjing,PAN Hongwei.Progress in the Application of Quantitative Flow Ratio in Acute Myocardial Infarction[J].Advances in Cardiovascular Diseases,2021,(7):347.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2021.04.014]
[3]陈佳仑 李树仁.不同策略血栓抽吸对于急性ST段抬高心肌梗死患者的研究进展[J].心血管病学进展,2021,(7):593.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2021.07.005]
 CHEN Jialun,LI Shuren.Different Strategies of Thrombus Aspiration in Patients with Acute ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction[J].Advances in Cardiovascular Diseases,2021,(7):593.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2021.07.005]
[4]梁晨笛 秦纲.经皮冠状动脉介入诊疗中穿刺路径研究进展[J].心血管病学进展,2022,(3):232.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2022.03.000]
 LIANG Chendi,QIN Gang.Puncture Routes in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention[J].Advances in Cardiovascular Diseases,2022,(7):232.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2022.03.000]
[5]马兴鸿 汪蕾 方纬.核素心肌显像在冠状动脉慢性完全闭塞临床诊疗中的应用价值[J].心血管病学进展,2022,(4):313.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2022.04.007]
 MA Xinghong,WANG Lei,FANG Wei.Application Value of Radionuclide Myocardial Imaging In the Clinical Diagnosis And Treatment of Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion[J].Advances in Cardiovascular Diseases,2022,(7):313.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2022.04.007]
[6]张爽 吴娜琼.腔内影像学在冠状动脉支架内再狭窄诊治应用中的研究进展[J].心血管病学进展,2022,(5):389.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2022.05.002]
 ZHANG Shuang,WU Na qiong.Application of Intravascular Imaging in Diagnosis and Treatment of Coronary In-Stent Restenosis[J].Advances in Cardiovascular Diseases,2022,(7):389.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2022.05.002]
[7]管翔 王宇 张成糕 周健 张艺 李庆国.经皮心室辅助装置在复杂高危冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用进展[J].心血管病学进展,2022,(5):394.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2022.05.003]
 GUAN Xiang,WANG Yu,ZHANG Chenggao,et al.Application Progress of Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device in Complex High-Risk Coronary Intervention[J].Advances in Cardiovascular Diseases,2022,(7):394.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2022.05.003]
[8]刘文 魏芳晶.药物涂层球囊在真性分叉病变中的研究进展[J].心血管病学进展,2022,(6):511.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2022.06.008]
 LIU WenWEI Fangjing.Study of Drug-Coated?Balloon in?rue Coronary Bifurcation Lesions[J].Advances in Cardiovascular Diseases,2022,(7):511.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2022.06.008]
[9]宋艳华 来春林 杨五小.急性 ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者微血管功能障碍的研究进展[J].心血管病学进展,2022,(6):530.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2022.06.013]
 SONG Yanhua,LAI Chunlin,YANG Wuxiao.Microvascular Dysfunction in Patients with Acute ST-Segment?levation Myocardial Infarction[J].Advances in Cardiovascular Diseases,2022,(7):530.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2022.06.013]
[10]纪欣强 王凡.肥胖悖论与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗预后相关性的研究进展[J].心血管病学进展,2022,(7):615.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2022.07.000]
 JI XinqiangWANG Fan.Correlation Between Obesity Paradox and Prognosis of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention[J].Advances in Cardiovascular Diseases,2022,(7):615.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2022.07.000]

更新日期/Last Update: 2023-08-18