[1]梁宇明 何燕.食道电极不同置入深度构建心房颤动大鼠模型比较[J].心血管病学进展,2020,(4):438-441.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2020.04.026]
　LIANG Yuming,HE Yan.Comparison of Rat Models of Atrial Fibrillation with Different Depth of Esophageal Electrode Implantation[J].Advances in Cardiovascular Diseases,2020,(4):438-441.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2020.04.026]
点击复制

食道电极不同置入深度构建心房颤动大鼠模型比较()
分享到：

《心血管病学进展》[ISSN:51-1187/R/CN:1004-3934]

卷:
期数:
2020年4期
页码:
438-441
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2020-04-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of Rat Models of Atrial Fibrillation with Different Depth of Esophageal Electrode Implantation
作者:
梁宇明 何燕
(广西医科大学第一附属医院老年病学心血管内科,广西 南宁 530021)
Author(s):
LIANG Yuming;  HE Yan
(Department of Cardiology,Gerontology,The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University ,Nanning 530021,Guangxi,China)
关键词:
大鼠模型; 食道调搏; 心房颤动
Keywords:
Rat model;  Esophageal pacing;  Atrial fibrillation
DOI:
10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2020.04.026
摘要:
目的 比较食道电极不同置入深度致心房颤动（房颤）大鼠模型的诱发率。方法：将18只健康成年雄性SD大鼠随机分为3组：心房上部组（A组，n＝6只）、心房部组（B组，n＝6只）、心房下部组（C组，n＝6只）。A、B、C组予不同深度食道电极置入，然后予电刺激起搏左心房诱发房颤发生，重复3次。结果 （1）A、B、C三组的房颤诱发率分别为5.6％、38.9％和27.8％，B、C两组诱发率比A组高，B组与A组差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05），B、C两组和A、C两组组间比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；（2）A、B、C三组食道电极置入深度分别为（6.53±0.19）cm、（7.15±0.23）cm和（7.58±0.75）cm；（3）三组食道心电图P波振幅分别为（1.25±0.10）mV、（2.10±0.09）mV和（1.67±0.12）mV。结论 B组的房颤诱发率最高，通过正态分布法求参考值范围得出，当食道电极置入深度约为6.70～7.60 cm，此时食道心电图P波振幅最大，参考范围是1.92～2.28 mV，大鼠房颤诱发率最高，因此优先选择该食道电极置入深度参考范围，房颤模型造模成功率最高。
Abstract:
Objective To compare the induction rate of rat model of atrial fibrillation(AF) induced by different depth of esophageal electrode implantation. Methods 24 healthy adult male SD rats were randomly divided into three groups :upper atrial group(group A,n=6),atrial group(group B,n=6) and lower atrial group(Group C,n=6). In group A,B and C,esophageal electrodes were implanted in different depths,and then pacing of left atrium was performed to induce atrial fibrillation. Results (1)T he induction rates of AF in group A,B and C were 5.6%,38.9% and 27.8% respectively,the induction rate of group B and C were higher than that of group A .The difference between group B and group A was statistically significant(P<0.05),but there was no significant difference between group B and C,and also between group A and C(P>0.05).(2)the insertion depth of esophageal electrodes in group A,B and C were (6.53±0.19)cm,(7.15±0.23)cm and ( 7.58±0.75)cm,respectively.(3)The amplitudes of P wave in three groups were (1.25±0.10)mV,(2.10±0.09)mV and (1.67±0.12)mV respectively. Conclusion group B has the highest atrial fibrillation induction rate. By using the normal distribution method to calculate the reference range,we can draw the conclusion that when the esophageal electrode implantation depth is about 6.70～7.60 cm,the esophageal ECG P wave amplitude is the largest,the reference range is 1.92～2.28 mv,and the rat’’s atrial fibrillation induction rate is the highest.Therefore,the first choice of the esophageal electrode implantation depth reference range,the highest success rate of atrial fibrillation model.

参考文献/References:

[1]曹凡,高艳香,王勇. 肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统在心房颤动患者心房重构中的研究进展[J]. 心血管病学进展,2018,39(4):528-531.

[2]曾莉钧,姜运秋,田颖,等. 持续性心房颤动内外科杂交消融手术进展[J]. 心血管病学进展,2017,38(1):1-3.

[3]Haeberlin A,Niederhauser T,Marisa T,et al. The optimal lead insertion depth for esophageal ECG recordings with respect to atrial signal quality[J]. J Electrocardiol ,2013,46(2):158-165.

[4]李阅历,钟理,杨攀,等. SD大鼠房颤模型的构建及其外周血IL-17A变化的实验研究[J]. 第三军医大学学报,2017,39(3):253-258.

[5]陈雯雯,罗章源,陈颖敏. 心房颤动动物模型建立的方法学[J]. 中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志,2010,24(5):390-393.

[6] Kamel H,Okin PM,Elkind MS,et al. Atrial fibrillation and mechanisms of stroke:time for a new model[J]. Stroke,2016,47(3):895-900.

[7]Hiram R,Naud P,Xiong F,et al. Right Atrial Mechanisms of Atrial Fibrillation in a Rat Model of Right Heart Disease[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019,74(10):1332-1347.

[8]景远文,李海瑞,黄驰雄,等. 超声引导经食道起搏电极定位建立大鼠快速心房起搏房颤模型的实验研究[J]. 临床超声医学杂志,2017(2):73-76.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：国家自然科学基金（81760061）
通讯作者：何燕，E-mail：hyxjwxy@126.com
收稿时间：2019-11-06
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-07-29