参考文献/References:
[1].Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)[J]. Eur Heart J, 2020.
[2].Andrade J G, Monir G, Pollak S J, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation using "contact force" ablation: the effect on dormant conduction and long-term freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation--a prospective study[J]. Heart Rhythm, 2014, 11(11): 1919-24.
[3].Buist TJ, Zipes DP, Elvan A. Atrial fibrillation ablation strategies and technologies: past, present, and future[J]. Clin Res Cardiol,2021,110(6):775-788.
[4].Winkle RA. High-power short-duration RF ablation for atrial fibrillation:a review[J]. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol,2020 Dec 31. doi: 10.1111/jce.14863.
[5].Yavin HD, Leshem E, Shapira-Daniels A, et al. Impact of high-power short-duration radiofrequency ablation on long-term lesion durability for atrial fibrillation ablation[J]. JACC Clin Electrophysiol,2020,6(8):973-985.
[6].Bhaskaran A, Chik W, Pouliopoulos J, et al. Five seconds of 50-60 W radio frequency atrial ablations were transmural and safe: an in vitro mechanistic assessment and force-controlled in vivo validation[J]. Europace, 2017, 19(5): 874-880.
[7].Leshem E, Zilberman I, Tschabrunn CM, et al. High-power and short-duration ablation for pulmonary vein isolation:biophysical characterization[J]. JACC Clin Electrophysiol,2018,4(4):467-479.
[8].Takigawa M, Kitamura T, Martin CA, et al. Temperature- and flow-controlled ablation/very-high-power short-duration ablation vs conventional power-controlled ablation:Comparison of focal and linear lesion characteristics[J]. Heart rhythm,?2021,18(4):553-561.
[9].Chinitz JS, Kapur S, Barbhaiya C, et al. Sites with small impedance decrease during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation are associated with recovery of pulmonary vein conduction[J]. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol,2016,27(12):1390-1398.
[10].[10] Kanamori N, Kato T, Sakagami S, et al. Optimal lesion size index to prevent con- duction gap during pulmonary vein isolation[J]. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol,2018,29 (12):1616-1623.
[11].[11] Pambrun T, Durand C, Constantin M, et al. High-Power (40-50 W) Radiofrequency Ablation Guided by Unipolar Signal Modification for Pulmonary Vein Isolation: Experimental Findings and Clinical Results[J]. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol, 2019, 12(6): e007304.
[12].[12] Taghji P, El Haddad M, Phlips T, et al. Evaluation of a Strategy Aiming to Enclose the Pulmonary Veins With Contiguous and Optimized Radiofrequency Lesions in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Pilot Study[J]. JACC. Clinical electrophysiology, 2018, 4(1).
[13].[13] Bourier F, Vlachos K, Frontera A, et al. In silico analysis of the relation between conventional and high-power short-duration RF ablation settings and resulting lesion metrics[J]. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol,2020,31(6):1332-1339.
[14].[14] Okamatsu H, Koyama J, Sakai Y, et al. High-power application is associated with shorter procedure time and higher rate of first-pass pulmonary vein isolation in ablation index-guided atrial fibrillation ablation[J]. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 2019, 30(12): 2751-2758.
[15].[15] Berte B, Hilfiker G, Russi I, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation using a higher power shorter duration CLOSE protocol with a surround flow ablation catheter[J]. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol,2019,30(11):2199-2204.
[16].[16] Vassallo F, Cunha C, Serpa E, et al. Comparison of high-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation of atrial fibrillation using a contact force-sensing catheter and conventional technique: Initial results[J]. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 2019, 30(10): 1877-1883.
[17].[17] Bunch TJ, May HT, Bair TL, et al. Long-term outcomes after low power,slower movement versus high power,faster movement irrigated-tip catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation[J]. Heart Rhythm,2020,17(2):184-189.
[18].[18] Kottmaier M, Popa M, Bourier F, et al. Safety and outcome of very high-power short-duration ablation using 70 W for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation[J]. Europace,2020,22(3):388-393.
[19].[19] Ejima K, Higuchi S, Yazaki K, et al. Comparison of high-power and conventional-power radiofrequency energy deliveries in pulmonary vein isolation using unipolar signal modification as a local endpoint[J]. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 2020, 31(7): 1702-1708.
[20].[20] Shin DG, Ahn J, Han SJ, et al. Efficacy of high-power and short-duration ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation:a prospective randomized controlled trial[J]. Europace,2020,22(10):1495-1501.
[21].[21] 孙国建, 王浩, 陈宇宁, 等。损伤指数指导下心房颤动高功率消融临床研究[J]. 心电与循环,2020,39(2):164-167.
[22].[22] Ravi V, Poudyal A, Abid QU, et al. High-power short duration vs. conventional radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Europace,2021,23(5):710-721.
[23].[23] Winkle RA, Mead RH, Engel G, et al. High-power,short-duration atrial fibrillation ablations using contact force sensing catheters:outcomes and predictors of success including posterior wall isolation[J]. Heart Rhythm,2020,17(8):1223-1231.
[24].[24] Winkle RA, Mohanty S, Patrawala RA, et al. Low complication rates using high power (45-50 W) for short duration for atrial fibrillation ablations[J]. Heart Rhythm,2019,16(2):165-169.
[25].[25] De Pooter J, Strisciuglio T, El Haddad M, et al. Pulmonary Vein Reconnection No Longer Occurs in the Majority of Patients After a Single Pulmonary Vein Isolation Procedure[J]. JACC Clin Electrophysiol, 2019, 5(3): 295-305.
[26].[26] Chen S, Schmidt B, Bordignon S, et al. Ablation index-guided 50 W ablation for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation:procedural data,lesion analysis,and initial results from the FAFA AI High Power Study[J]. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol,2019,30(12):2724-2731.
相似文献/References:
[1]简军 殷跃辉.APPLE评分与心房颤动[J].心血管病学进展,2020,(6):616.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2020.06.014]
JIAN Jun,YIN Yuehui.The APPLE Score and Atrial Fibrillation[J].Advances in Cardiovascular Diseases,2020,(10):616.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2020.06.014]
[2]范建华 刘庆军.高功率短时程射频消融治疗心房颤动的研究进展[J].心血管病学进展,2020,(8):806.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2020.08.006]
FAN JIanhuaLIU Qingjun.High Power Short Duration Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation[J].Advances in Cardiovascular Diseases,2020,(10):806.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2020.08.006]
[3]颜如玉 赵海玉 张建武 彭健.心房颤动高功率短时程消融的临床应用进展[J].心血管病学进展,2021,(1):39.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2021.01.000]
YAN Ruyu,ZHAO Haiyu,ZHANG Jianwu,et al.Clinical Application of High-power and Short-term Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation[J].Advances in Cardiovascular Diseases,2021,(10):39.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2021.01.000]
[4]洪璐 曹明强 周亚峰.2016年ASE/EACVI指南评估的左室舒张功能对阵发性心房颤动术后复发的预测价值[J].心血管病学进展,2021,(5):464.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2021.05.019]
HONG Lu,CAO Mingqiang,ZHOU Yafeng.Predictive Value of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function Assessed by 2016 ASE/EACVI Guidelines for Postoperative Recurrence of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation[J].Advances in Cardiovascular Diseases,2021,(10):464.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2021.05.019]
[5]徐尧 蔡衡 李洪仕.射频消融与药物治疗对心房颤动合并心力衰竭患者的疗效差异比较[J].心血管病学进展,2022,(3):274.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2022.03.000]
[6]李宸 章海燕 徐少华 许海南 张祖宏 龙明智.消融指数指导心房颤动射频消融的有效性和安全性的荟萃分析[J].心血管病学进展,2022,(2):171.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2022.02.019]
LI Chen,ZHANG Haiyan,XU Shaohua,et al.Efficacy and Safety of Radiofrequency Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Guided by?blation Index: A Meta-Analysis[J].Advances in Cardiovascular Diseases,2022,(10):171.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2022.02.019]
[7]柯嘉伟 黄松群 黄新苗 马丽萍.左心房心房扑动射频消融治疗进展[J].心血管病学进展,2023,(5):425.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2023.05.010]
KE Jiawei,HUANG Songqun,HUANG Xinmiao,et al.Advances in Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Left Atrial Flutter[J].Advances in Cardiovascular Diseases,2023,(10):425.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2023.05.010]