[1]张晓东 罗丽 项涛.机械按压对心搏骤停患者自主循环恢复及预后的影响因素分析[J].心血管病学进展,2021,(8):737-741.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2021.08.016]
 ZHANG Xiaodong,LUO Li,XIANG Tao.Analysis of Influence Factors for Mechanical Compressions on Return of Spontaneous Circulation and Prognosis in Patients with Cardiac Arrest[J].Advances in Cardiovascular Diseases,2021,(8):737-741.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2021.08.016]
点击复制

机械按压对心搏骤停患者自主循环恢复及预后的影响因素分析()
分享到:

《心血管病学进展》[ISSN:51-1187/R/CN:1004-3934]

卷:
期数:
2021年8期
页码:
737-741
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2021-08-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis of Influence Factors for Mechanical Compressions on Return of Spontaneous Circulation and Prognosis in Patients with Cardiac Arrest
作者:
张晓东 罗丽 项涛
(西南交通大学附属医院 成都市第三人民医院急诊科,四川 成都 610031)
Author(s):
ZHANG XiaodongLUO LiXIANG Tao
( Emergency Department,The Third Peoples Hospital of Chengdu,The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Jiaotong University,Chengdu 610031,Sichuan,China)
关键词:
心肺复苏心搏骤停自主循环恢复机械按压Lucas
Keywords:
Cardiopulmonary resuscitationCardiac arrestReturn of spontaneous circulationMechanical compression sLucas
DOI:
10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2021.08.016
摘要:
目的 探讨 机械按压对急诊科非创伤心搏骤停患者自主循环恢复(ROSC)及预后的影响因素。方法 回顾性分析2018年6月1日 —2019年12月31日在急诊抢救室使用机械按压治疗的急性非创伤性心搏骤停患者的临床资料,根据心搏骤停患者心肺复苏(CPR)后是否发生ROSC,分为ROSC组和非ROSC组,采用多因素logistic回归分析影响心搏骤停患者机械按压后ROSC及预后的影响因素。结果 单因素分析显示 CPR持续时间≤30 min,肾上腺素用量≤5 mg,早期使用Lucas心肺复苏仪(≤4 min),入抢救室时pH>7.05,Lucas使用后15 min呼气末二氧化碳分压(PETCO2)是心搏骤停患者使用机械按压后ROSC的独立影响因素(P<0.05)。经过多因素logistic回归分析校正混杂因素后最终显示CPR持续时间≤30 min(OR 283.489,95%CI 14.474~5 552.565),早期使用Lucas(≤4 min)(OR 1.986,95%CI 0.298~13.223),入抢救室时pH>7.05(OR 0.054,95%CI 0.005~0.589),Lucas使用后15 min PETCO2>20 mm Hg(OR 0.005,95%CI 0.000~0.149)是机械按压后ROSC的保护因素(P<0.05)。机械按压可以提高急诊科心搏骤停患者的ROSC率,早期使用Lucas(≤4 min)和晚期使用Lucas(>4 min)两组相比ROSC恢复后最终存活入院率相似,但早期组4 h存活率较好。结论 对于急诊非创伤性 心搏骤停患者,早期使用机械按压可能提高急诊科非创伤心搏骤停患者的ROSC率和4 h存活率。复苏时间,早期使用Lucas,入抢救室时pH和Lucas使用15 min后PETCO2值与ROSC密切相关。
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the influencing factors for mechanical Compressions on return of spontaneous circulation(ROSC) and prognosis of patients with non-traumatic cardiac arrest(CA) in emergency department(ED). Methods Clinical data of patients with non-traumatic CA underwent mechanical Compressions from June 1,2018 to December 31,2019 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were divided into ROSC and non-ROSC group based on the presence of ROSC or not after CPR. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to analyze influence factors for ROSC and prognosis. Result Results of univariate analysis showed CPR duration ≤30 min,epinephrine dosage≤5 mg,early use of Lucas(≤4 min),arterial blood pH>7.05 on arriving at ED,PETCO2>20 mm Hg after 15 mins use of Lucas(P<0.05)were independent influence factors for ROSC in patients with CA underwent mechanical Compressions. After adjustment for confounding factors,multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed CPR duration≤30 min(OR 283.489,95%CI 14.474~5 552.565),early use of Lucas ( ≤4 min)(OR 1.986,95%CI 0.298~13.223),pH>7.05 on arriving at ED(OR 0.054,95%CI 0.005~0.589),PETCO2>20 mm Hg after 15 mins use of Lucas(OR 0.005,95%CI 0.000~0.149) were protective factors for ROSC after mechanical Compressions(P<0.05). Mechanical compression improved ROSC rate of CA patients in ED. Despite the final admission rates after survival for ROSC were similar between early(≤4 min) and late(>4 min) use of Lucas group ,yet survival rate at 4 h was better in early group. Conclusion For patients with non-traumatic CA in ED,early use of mechanical compressions may improve ROSC rate and 4h survival rate. CPR duration ,early use of Lucas,arterial blood pH on arriving at ED and P ETCO2 after 15 mins use of Lucas are closely related to the ROSC rate.

参考文献/References:


[1] 于虎,沈开金,敖其,等. 急诊心肺复苏4年间变化趋势的单中心研究[J]. 中华危重病急救医学,2014,26(10):734-736.

[2] Shao F,Li CS,Liang LR,et al. Outcome of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in Beijing,China[J].Resuscitation,2014,85(11):1411-1417.

[3] Ock SM,Kim YM,Chung Jh,et al. Influence of physical fitness on the performance of 5-minute continuous chest compression[J]. Eur J Emerg Med,2011,18(5):251-256.

[4] Liu M,Shuai Z,Ai J,et al. Mechanical chest compression with LUCAS device does not improve clinical outcome in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients:A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Medicine(Baltimore),2019,98(44):e17550.

[5] Neumar RW,Shuster M,Callaway CW,et al. Part 1:executive summary:2015 American Heart Association Guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care[J]. Circulation,2015,132(18 suppl 2):S315-S367.

[6] Kahn PA,Dhruva SS,Rhee TG,et al. Use of mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation devices for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest,2010-2016[J]. JAMA Netw Open,2019,2(10):e1913298.

[7] 王冠,刘赛,蒋波,等. 机械按压与徒手按压在心肺复苏过程中抢救心脏骤停患者的效果比较[J]. 国际外科学杂志,2017,44(10):668-672.

[8] Dickinson ET,Verdile VP,Schneider RM,et al. Effectiveness of mechanical versus manual chest compressions in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation:a pilot study [J]. Am J Emerg Med,1998,16(3):289-292.

[9] Perkins GD,Lall R,Quinn T,et al. Mechanical versus manual chest compression for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC):a pragmatic,cluster randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet,2015,385(9972):947-955.

[10] Ward KR,Menegazzi JJ,Zelenak RR,et al. A comparison of chest compressions between mechanical and manual CPR by monitoring end-tidal PCO2 during human cardiac arrest[J]. Ann Emerg Med ,1993,22(4):669-674.

[11] 刘丽丽,黄坚强,陈晓蕾,等. 萨勃心肺复苏器在心搏骤停肥胖患者中的应用 [J]. 中华危重病急救医学,2016,28(7):659-660.

[12] Panchal AR,Berg KM,Hirsch KG,et al.2019 American Heart Association focused update on advanced cardiovascular life support:use of advanced airways,vasopressors,and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation during cardiac arrest:an update to the American Heart Association Guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care[J]. Circulation,2019,140(24):e881-e894.

[13] Hock Ong ME,Fook-Chong S,Annathurai A,et al. Improved neurologically intact survival with the use of an automated,load-distributing band chest compression device for cardiac arrest presenting to the emergency department[J]. Crit Care,2012,16(4):R144.

[14] Youngquist ST,Ockerse P,Hartsell S,et al. Mechanical chest compression devices are associated with poor neurological survival in a statewide registry:a propensity score analysis[J]. Resuscitation,2016,106:102-107.

[15] Bonnes JL,Brouwer MA,Navarese EP,et al. Manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation versus CPR including a mechanical chest compression device in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest:a comprehensive meta-analysis from randomized and observational studies[J]. Ann Emerg Med,2016,67(3):349-360.e3.

[16] Levy M,Yost D,Walker RG,et al. A quality improvement initiative to optimize use of a mechanical chest compression device within a high-performance CPR approach to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation[J]. Resuscitation,2015,92:32-37.

[17] 周夷霞,韩文文,宋丹丹. 心脏骤停患者心肺复苏后影响自主循环及预后的因素[J]. 心电与循环,2020,39(3):251-255.

[18] Momiyama Y,Yamada W,Miyata K,et al. Prognostic values of blood pH and lactate levels in patients resuscitated from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest[J]. Acute Med Surg,2017,4(1):25-30.

[19] Wang AY,Huang CH,Chang WT,et al. Initial end-tidal CO2 partial pressure predicts outcomes of in-hospital cardiac arrest[J]. Am J Emerg Med ,2016,34(12):2367-2371.

[20] Seder DB,Sunde K,Rubertsson S,et al. Neurologic outcomes and postresuscitation care of patients with myoclonus following cardiac arrest[J]. Crit Care Med,2015,43(5):965-972.

[21] 顾伟,李春盛. 心脏骤停后综合征——类脓毒症样综合征[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志,2019,28(1):121-123.

[22] 蔡志仕,方文革,陈惠鸿,等. 院内心搏骤停预后的影响因素分析[J]. 创伤与急诊电子杂志,2019,7(1):16-21.

[23] Wik L,Olsen JA, Persse D,et al,Manual vs. integrated automatic load-distributing band CPR with equal survival after out of hospital cardiac arrest. The randomized CIRC trial[J]. Resuscitation,2014,85(6):741-748.

[24] Rubertsson S,Lindgren E,Smekal D,et al. Mechanical chest compressions and simultaneous defibrillation vs conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest:the LINC randomized trial[J]. JAMA,2014,311(1):53-61.

[25] Bekg?z B,?an ?,Ergin M. Quality comparison of the manual chest compression and the mechanical chest compression during difficult transport conditions[J]. J Emerg Med.,2020,58(3):432-438.

[26] Ong ME,Quah JL,Annathurai A,et al. Improving the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation by training dedicated cardiac arrest teams incorporating a mechanical load-distributing device at the emergency department[J]. Resuscitation,2013,84(4):508-514.

[27] Jin K,Fu Y,Yin L,et al. Influence factors analysis of mechanical compression and hands-only compression on restoration of spontaneous circulation and prognosis in patients with cardiac arrest[J]. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue,2019,31(3):303-308.

[28] 李伟,于学忠.机械胸外按压:主力还是替补?[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2015,24(10):1186-1189.

[29] Dadeh AA,Nuanjaroan B. Using initial serum lactate level in the emergency department to predict the sustained return of spontaneous circulation in nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients[J]. Open Access Emerg Med,2018,10:105-111.

[30] 顾建新.呼气末二氧化碳分压连续监测在心肺复苏患者中的意义[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2019,28(4):448-451.

[31] Sheak KR,Wiebe DJ,Leary M,et al. Quantitative relationship between end-tidal carbon dioxide and CPR quality during both in-hospital and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest[J]. Resuscitation,2015,89:149-154.

相似文献/References:

[1]何佳玲 叶滔 周名纲 蔡琳.静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合在心脏危重症中的救治[J].心血管病学进展,2021,(3):256.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2021.03.016]
 HE Jialing,YE Tao,ZHOU Minggang,et al.Application of Veno-arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Critical Cardiac Disease[J].Advances in Cardiovascular Diseases,2021,(8):256.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2021.03.016]
[2]罗梦笛 何庆.心肺复苏后肠黏膜屏障功能受损机制的研究进展[J].心血管病学进展,2022,(3):241.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2022.03.000]
 LUO Mengdi,HE Qing.Mechanism of Intestinal Mucosal Barrier Function Impairment after Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation[J].Advances in Cardiovascular Diseases,2022,(8):241.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2022.03.000]
[3]张晓东 罗丽 项涛.心肺复苏辅助装置和团队心肺复苏的研究进展[J].心血管病学进展,2021,(5):442.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2021.05.014]
 ZHANG Xiaodong,LUO Li,XIANG Tao.Auxiliary Device and Team-focused in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation[J].Advances in Cardiovascular Diseases,2021,(8):442.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2021.05.014]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:四川省卫生和计划生育委员会科研课题(18PJ323)通信作者:项涛,E-mail:1142752929@qq.com共同第一作者:罗丽收稿日期:2021-01-15
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-09-26