[1]于文波 陈振良 董向阳 陈忠建 崔亚洲 王鹏高 翟波.经食管超声引导三种不同路径封堵婴幼儿房间隔缺损的对比分析[J].心血管病学进展,2021,(9):849-852.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.20.09.000]
点击复制

经食管超声引导三种不同路径封堵婴幼儿房间隔缺损的对比分析()
分享到：

《心血管病学进展》[ISSN:51-1187/R/CN:1004-3934]

卷:
期数:
2021年9期
页码:
849-852
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2021-09-25

文章信息/Info

文章编号:
202012109
作者:
于文波 陈振良 董向阳 陈忠建 崔亚洲 王鹏高 翟波
(郑州大学附属儿童医院 河南省儿童医院 郑州儿童医院胸心外科,河南 郑州 450000)
Author(s):
?Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery,Zhengzhou Children’s Hospital,Henan Children’s Hospital,Children’s Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450000,Henan,China)
关键词:
房间隔缺损; 经食管超声心动图检查; 微创封堵; 经股静脉; 经颈静脉; 右腋下小切口
Keywords:
Atrial septal defect; Trans-esophageal echocardiography; Minimally invasive occlusion; Transfemoral vein; Transjugular vein; Right subaxillary small incision
DOI:
10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.20.09.000
摘要:
目的 分析比较经食管超声心动图检查（TEE）引导下三种不同路径行外科微创封堵术治疗婴幼儿房间隔缺损（ASD）的临床资料，探讨适宜的ASD外科封堵方案。方法 回顾性分析2019年1月1日—12月31日于郑州大学附属儿童医院住院治疗的91例TEE引导行ASD封堵术患儿的临床资料，按实施手术路径的不同分为三组:经股静脉封堵组（股静脉组）（28例）、经颈静脉封堵组（颈静脉组）（20例）和经右腋下小切口封堵组（右腋下组）（43例）。记录分析三组患儿的平均年龄、体重、缺损大小、手术成功率、手术时间、住院时间及并发症发生情况等。结果 三组手术时间、出血量、住院时间及并发症发生情况无显著差异。三组手术时平均年龄、体重及缺损大小差异存在统计学意义（P均＜0.05）；两两比较，颈静脉组手术年龄、体重大于右腋下组（P均＜0.05），但小于股静脉组（P均＜0.05），右腋下组缺损直径小于颈静脉组和股静脉组（P均＜0.05），而颈静脉组缺损大小与股静脉组差异无统计学意义（P＝0.156）。结论 三种路径都能安全有效地实施经TEE引导的ASD外科微创封堵术；经股静脉及颈静脉路径创伤最小，但需严苛的条件；右腋下路径有更宽的适应证，切口隐蔽，亦符合微创理念；应个体化地选择封堵路径使患儿获益最大。
Abstract:
Objective To analyze and compare the clinical data of minimally invasive surgical closure of atrial septal defect(ASD) in infants under the guidance of trans-esophageal echocardiography(TEE),and to explore the appropriate surgical closure scheme of ASD. Methods The clinical data of 91 patients with ASD occlusion guided by TEE who were hospitalized in Children’s Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University from January 1,2019 to December 31,2019 were analyzed retrospectively. They were divided into three groups according to the different surgical paths:femoral vein occlusion group(28 cases in femoral vein group);transjugular vein occlusion group(20 cases in jugular vein group);blocking group through right subaxillary small incision(43 cases in right subaxillary group). The average age,weight,defect size,operation success rate,operation time,hospitalization time and complications of the three groups were recorded and analyzed. Results There was no significant difference in operation time,blood loss,hospitalization time and complications among the three groups. There were significant differences in average age,weight and defect size among the three groups(P＜0.05). In pairwise comparison,the operative age and weight of jugular vein group were larger than those of right subaxillary group(P＜0.05),but smaller than those of femoral vein group(P＜0.05). The defect size of right subaxillary group was smaller than that of jugular vein group and femoral vein group(P＜0.05),but there was no significant difference between jugular vein group and femoral vein group(P＝0.156). Conclusion All three approaches can safely and effectively implement minimally invasive ASD surgical occlusion guided by TEE. The trauma through femoral vein and jugular vein pathway is the least,but it needs strict conditions. The right subaxillary path has wider indications and hidden incision,which is also in line with the concept of minimally invasive surgery.The blocking path should be selected individually to maximize the benefit of children

参考文献/References:

[1].Reece AS,Hulse GK. Contemporary epidemiology of rising atrial septal defect trends across USA 1991—2016:a combined ecological geospatiotemporal and causal inferential study[J]. BMC Pediatr,2020,20(1):539.
[2].Askari B,Soraya H,Ayremlu N,et al. Short-term outcomes after surgical versus transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects:a study from Iran[J]. Egypt Heart J,2018,70(4):249-253.
[3].Ali SH,El Sisi A,Raafat DM,et al. Short-term outcomes of transcatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defect in children and adolescents:an experience of two centers in Upper Egypt[J]. J Saudi Heart Assoc,2018,30(1):14-20.
[4].中国医师协会儿科医师分会先天性心脏病专家委员会. 儿童常见先天性心脏病介入治疗专家共识[J]. 中华儿科杂志2015,53(1):17-23.
[5].潘湘斌,曹华,李红昕等. 单纯超声心动图引导经皮介入技术中国专家共识[J]. 中国循环杂志,2018,33(10):943-952.
[6].Cohen S,Liu A,Gurvitz M,et al. Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from cardiac procedures and malignancy risk in adults with congenital heart disease[J]. Circulation,2018,137(13):1334-1345.
[7].Pan XB,Ouyang WB,Wang SZ,et al. Transthoracic echocardiography guided percutaneous patent ductus arteriosus occlusion:a new strategy for interventional treatment[J]. Echocardiography,2016,33(7):1040-1045.
[8].Sharfi MH,Al-Ata J,Al-Kouatli A,et al. Safety and efficacy of transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect typeⅡ under transthoracic echocardiographic guidance:a case control study[J]. J Saudi Heart Assoc,2019,31(1):2-8.
[9].Farhaj Z,Hongxin L,Wenbin G,et al. Device closure of diverse layout of multi-hole secundum atrial septal defect:different techniques and long-term follow-up[J]. J Cardiothorac Surg,2019,14(1):130.
[10].杨秋蓝,张燕搏,潘湘斌,等. 经胸微创封堵术治疗先天性心脏病临床分析[J]. 中华实用诊断与治疗杂志,2016,30(4):363-365.
[11].Yerram S,Aramalla S,Bhyravavajhala S. Unconventional deployment of atrial septal occluder in a patient with atrial septal defect,dextrocardia,and interrupted inferior vena cava[J]. Cardiol Young,2020,30(8):1206-1208.
[12].Butera G,Lovin N,Basile DP. How to deal with atrial septal defect closure from right internal jugular vein:role of venous-arterial circuit for sizing and over-the-wire device implantation[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2017,89(1):120-123.

相似文献/References:

[1]王健 刘美英 廖清池.房间隔缺损合并心房颤动的介入治疗进展[J].心血管病学进展,2019,(7):1028.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2019.07.016]
　WANG Jian,LIU Meiying,LIAO Qingchi.Interventional Therapy of Atrial Septal Defect with Atrial Fibrillation[J].Advances in Cardiovascular Diseases,2019,(9):1028.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2019.07.016]
[2]尚帅 李耀东 周贤惠 陈诚 汤宝鹏.左心耳自发显影的临床评价[J].心血管病学进展,2021,(9):792.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2021.09.000]
　SHANG ShuaiLI YaodongZHOU XianhuiCHEN Cheng Tang Baopeng.Clinical Evaluation of Left Atrial Appendage Spontaneous Echo Contrast[J].Advances in Cardiovascular Diseases,2021,(9):792.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2021.09.000]
[3]伍杨 白元 赵仙先.房间隔缺损与左心耳封堵一站式手术的研究进展[J].心血管病学进展,2022,(6):485.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2022.06.002]
　WU YangBAI YuanZHAO Xianxian.One-Stop Operation for Atrial Septal Defect and?eft Atrial Appendage Closure[J].Advances in Cardiovascular Diseases,2022,(9):485.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2022.06.002]
[4]李思聪 罗勤 赵智慧 赵青 柳志红.房间隔缺损相关肺动脉高压机制及治疗进展[J].心血管病学进展,2024,(1):11.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2024.01.004]
　LI Sicong,LUO Qin,ZHAO Zhihui,et al.Pathogenesis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension Associated with Atrial Septal Defect[J].Advances in Cardiovascular Diseases,2024,(9):11.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2024.01.004]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2020-12-29基金项目：河南省医学科技攻关联合共建项目（LHGJ20190889）
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-10-29