[1]向军何玲李东林魏蜀亮彭泰峦彭慧.65岁以上急性主动脉壁内血肿患者临床特点及治疗[J].心血管病学进展,2021,(2):183.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2021.02.021]
点击复制

65岁以上急性主动脉壁内血肿患者临床特点及治疗()
分享到：

《心血管病学进展》[ISSN:51-1187/R/CN:1004-3934]

卷:
期数:
2021年2期
页码:
183
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2021-02-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical Features and Treatments of Acute Aortic Intramural Hematomas in Patients over 65 Years
作者:
向军1何玲2李东林1魏蜀亮1彭泰峦1彭慧1
川北医学院附属医院心脏大血管外科，四川 南充 637000；2.川北医学院附属医院儿科，四川 南充 637000
Author(s):
 (1.Department of Cardiac Macrovascular SurgeryAffiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical CollegeNanchong 637000China;2.Department of paediatrics,Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College,Nanchong 637000,Sichuan,China)
关键词:
老年人; 主动脉壁内血肿; 胸主动脉腔内修复术; 临床特点
Keywords:
Eaged;  Intramural aortic hematoma;  Thoracic endovascular aortic repair;  Clinical feature
DOI:
10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2021.02.021
摘要:
目的 总结65岁以上老年患者主动脉壁内血肿（IMH）的临床特点并探讨治疗方案的选择，以期为临床诊治提供参考。方法 回顾性分析2011年1月2018年12月川北医学院附属医院收治的63例65岁以上老年IMH患者的临床资料，所有患者术前均行胸腹血管以明确诊断。其中24例患者仅接受单纯药物治疗（保守治疗组），39例患者接受药物治疗同时行手术治疗（手术治疗组）。收集两组患者的一般资料及治疗经过，分析两组患者不同治疗方案的预后。根据数据类型，分别选用卡方检验、t检验。 结果 63例患者中男性44例，女性19例，发病率以冬、春季节高，共46例（73%）；保守治疗组年龄手术治疗组[（74.14±6.55）岁vs（68.28±8.62）岁]；手术治疗组患者3级高血压比例及合并溃疡样突起或穿透性溃疡及合并心包或胸腔积液比例明显高于保守治疗组[47.6% vs 12.7%；52.4% vs 19.5%；39.7% vs 6.4%P＜0.05]；两组性别、发病季节、诊断时长、临床表现、血肿累及范围比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；60例获得随访，随访率95.2%，手术治疗组患者症状缓解率及血肿吸收率明显高于保守治疗组[（97.4% vs 70.8%92.3% vs 66.7%，P＜0.05]；手术治疗组主动脉夹层发生率明显低于保守治疗组[0.0% vs 16.7%P＜0.05]；两组并发症发生率及死亡率差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；虽然保守治疗组再次手术干预率高于手术治疗组[12.5% vs 2.6%]，但差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论 65岁以上老年IMH多见于男性，其中又以Stanford B型多见，冬春季节好发；对于单纯型老年IMH，可选择保守治疗；对于合并溃疡样突起或穿透性溃疡及心包或胸腔积液的复杂型老年IMH，手术治疗效果优于保守治疗，但应尽量避免创伤较大的手术，杂交手术及胸主动脉腔内修复是目前治疗老年IMH的主要的手术方式。
Abstract:
Objective To summarize clinical characteristics and explore therapeutic options of intramural aortic hematoma(IMH) in elderly patients over 65 years in hope of providing reference on clinical diagnosis and treatment. Method Clinical data of 63 elderly patients over 65 years with IMH admitted in the affiliated hospital of North Sichuan Medical College from Janu 2011 to Dec 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. All the patients were diagnosed by computed tomography angiography of thoracic and abdominal aorta before surgery,24 of whom were only treated with medications (conservative treatment group,CT group) and the other 39 both received surgeries and medications(surgical treatment group,ST group). General data and therapeutic processes were collected,and prognosis of patients with different therapeutic options were analyzed. Chi-square test and t-test were selected for statistic analysis based on data type. Result 63 patients consist of 44 males and 19 females. Morbidity of IMH was high in winter and spring,accounting for 73 percents(46 cases). With mean age of CT group higher than ST group[(74.14±6.55) years vs (68.28±8.62) years],proportions of grade 3 hypertension and complicated with ulcer-like protrusions(ULP) or penetrating aortic ulcer(PAU),hydropericardium or hydrothorax in ST group were significantly higher than CT group(47.6% vs 12.7%; 52.4% vs 19.5%; 39.7% vs 6.4%,respectively). There exist no significant differences in gender,onset season,diagnostic duration,clinical manifestation and hematomas scope between two groups (P>0.05). 60 cases were followed-up with the follow-up rate of 95.2 percents. Compared to CT group,rates of symptoms relief and hematomas absorption in ST group were significantly higher[(97.4% vs 70.8%; 92.3% vs 66.7%，P＜0.05] concurrent with a decreased incidence of aortic dissection(AD)[0.0% vs 16.7%P ＜0.05]. Incidence of complications and mortality between two groups were statistically insignificant(P0.05). The re-operation rate was slightly greater in CT group than ST group,yet without a significant difference(12.5% vs 2.6%,P＞0.05). Conclusion The man over 65 years was susceptible to IMH,with a common type of Stanford B and on-set season of winter and spring. Conservative treatments were appropriate for the elderly with simple IMH,to which surgeries may be superior for complex IMH complicated with ULP or PAU,hydropericardium or hydrothorax. However,operations with great trauma should be avoided. Hybrid surgery and thoracic endovascular aortic repair have been main surgical methods for the elderly with IMH at present. 中频词，你记住了吗？

参考文献/References:

[1] Weiss S,Sen I,Huang Y,Killian JM,et al. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality after aortic dissection,intramural hematoma,and penetrating aortic ulcer.[J]. J Vasc Surg,2019,S0741-5214(19):30173-30179.
[2]Murphy MC,Castner CF,Kouchoukos NT,et al. Acute aortic syndromes:diagnosis and treatment[J].Mo Med,2017,114(6):458-463.
[3]DeMartino RR,Sen I,Huang Y,et al.Population-based assessment of the incidence of aortic dissection,intramural hematoma,and penetrating ulcer,and its associated mortality from 1995 to 2015[J]. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes,2018,11(8):e004689.
[4]向俾桃,罗新锦,丘俊涛,等.主动脉壁内血肿的治疗策略[J].中华胸心血管外科杂志[J],2018,34(11):668-670.
[5]Oderich GSKarkkainen JM,Reed NR,et al. Penetrating aortic ulcer and intramural hematoma[J].Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol,2019,42(3):321-334.
[6]Moral S,Ballesteros E,Roque M,et al.Intimal disruption in type B aortic intramural hematoma. Does size matter? A systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Int J Cardiol,2018,15(269):298-303.
[7]Li Z,Lu B,Chen Y,Hou Z,et al. Acute type B aortic intramural hematoma: the added prognostic value of a follow-up CT[J].Eur Radiol,2019,29(12):6571-6580.
[8]Li L,Jiao Y,Zou J,et al.Thoracic endovascular aortic repair versus best medical treatment for high-risk type B intramural hematoma: a systematic review of clinical studies[J].Ann Vasc Surg,2018,52:273-279.
[9]Cervi E,Nodari F,Botteri E,et al.Appearance and rapid evolution of thoraco-abdominal intramural hematoma after TEVAR[J].JRSM Cardiovasc Dis,2017,22(6):2048004017710884.
[10]Ferrera C,Vilacosta I,Gomez-Polo JC,et al.Evolution and prognosis of intramural aortic hematoma. Insights from a midterm cohort study[J].Int J Cardiol,2017,15(249):410-413.
[11]Bonaca MP,O’Gara PT. Diagnosis and management of acute aortic syndromes: dissection,intramural hematoma and penetrating aortic ulcer[J]. Curr Cardiol Rep,2014,16(10): 536.
[12]Lautenbacher S. Experimental approaches in the study of pain in the elderly[J]. Pain Med,2012,13(suppl 2):S44-50.
[13]李江,赵建廷,沈利明,等.60岁以上非外伤性主动脉壁内血肿患者临床特点及治疗[J].中华胸心血管外科杂志,2019,35(1):25-28.
[14]张林枫,李震,王志伟,等.老年Stanford B型主动脉夹层的临床特点及治疗方案选择[J].中华老年多器官疾病杂志2017,16(10):749-754.
[15]彭文星,赵宏磊,乔环宇,等.急性主动脉夹层的药物辅助治疗[J].中华胸心血管外科杂志2018,34(4):254-256.
[16] Paolucci M,Van Damme H,Boesmans E,et al.Type A intramural hematoma of aorta: An undervalued clinical entity[J].J Med Vasc,2018,43(3):206-212.
[17]Wang TC,Kuo CL. Aortic intramural hematoma,stanford type A[J].J Emerg Med,2017,53(6):e137-e138.
[18]Plichta RP,Hughes GC.Thoracic endovascular aortic repair for the ascending aorta:experience and pitfalls[J].J Vis Surg,2018,9(4):92.
[19]Liu YJ,Zhang QY,Du ZK,et al.Long-term follow-up and clinical implications in Chinese patients with aortic intramural hematomas[J].Int J Cardiol,2018,1(270):268-272.
[20] 向军何玲彭慧等. 急性创伤性Stanford B型主动脉夹层的早期诊断及腔内修复治疗[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志2020,29(5):726-730.
[21] Daye D,Walker TG. Complications of endovascular aneurysm repair of the thoracic and abdominal aorta: evaluation and management[J].Cardiovasc Diagn Ther,2018,8(suppl 1): S138-S156.

相似文献/References:

[1]孙林芳 朱凌燕.老年心房颤动患者抗凝服药依从性及其影响因素分析[J].心血管病学进展,2020,(9):978.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2020.09.022]
　SUN Linfang,ZHU Lingyan.Compliance with Anticoagulant Medication and Its Influencing Factors in Elderly Patients with Atrial Fibrillation[J].Advances in Cardiovascular Diseases,2020,(2):978.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2020.09.022]
[2]董小久 习玲.肌少症筛查测试与老年心力衰竭的研究进展[J].心血管病学进展,2021,(4):360.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2021.04.017]
　DONG Xiaojiu,XI Ling.Research Progress on Screening Test of Sarcopenia and Heart Failure in the Elderly[J].Advances in Cardiovascular Diseases,2021,(2):360.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2021.04.017]
[3]张冰 刘珊珊 隗东方 展为红 颜阳 吴惠人.冠状动脉血运重建与老年人认知功能的研究进展[J].心血管病学进展,2022,(3):225.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2022.03.000]
　ZHANG Bing,LIU Shanshan,WEI Dongfang,et al.Association Between Coronary Revascularization and Cognitive Function in Elderly[J].Advances in Cardiovascular Diseases,2022,(2):225.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2022.03.000]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2020-06-23 基金项目：川北医学院校级科研发展项目(CBY16-A-YB20)
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-06-16