[1]孙涛 左权 周辉 刘安康 梁诚 汤圣兴.末梢桡动脉和无鞘技术在冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用现状[J].心血管病学进展,2020,(5):456-461.[doi:10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2020.05.005]
点击复制

末梢桡动脉和无鞘技术在冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用现状()
分享到：

《心血管病学进展》[ISSN:51-1187/R/CN:1004-3934]

卷:
期数:
2020年5期
页码:
456-461
栏目:
出版日期:
2020-05-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Distal Radial Artery Puncture?span>and Sheathless Technique in Coronary Intervention
作者:
孙涛 左权 周辉 刘安康 梁诚 汤圣兴
（皖南医学院附属弋矶山医院心血管内科,安徽 芜湖 241000)
Author(s):
Department of Cardiology,Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College,Wuhu 241000,A nhui,China)
关键词:
冠状动脉介入; 穿刺途径; 末梢桡动脉; 无鞘技术; 冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病
Keywords:
Coronary intervention;  Puncture site;  Distal radial artery;  Sheathless;  Coronary artery disease
DOI:
10.16806/j.cnki.issn.1004-3934.2020.05.005
摘要:
随着冠状动脉介入技术和材料的不断进步，越来越多的复杂病变被攻克。相比于旋磨技术、药物球囊和可吸收支架的使用，穿刺部位的选择和无鞘技术的运用往往得不到大多数术者的重视，实际上，末梢桡动脉途径具有更小的术后出血及血管闭塞风险，无鞘技术减少股动脉的使用，提高了患者术后的生活质量。现就目前末梢桡动脉和无鞘技术在冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用现状做一综述。
Abstract:
As the progress of coronary intervention techniques and materials develops, more and more complicated diseases have been well treated. Unlike some techniques such as rotational atherectomy, drug balloon and absorbable stent, the puncture site selection and the application of sheathless guiding catheters often do not get the attention of most operators. Actually, the puncture site of distal radial artery has lower risk of postoperative bleeding and vascular occlusion, and the application of sheathless guiding catheters reduced the utility of femoral artery during percutaneous coronary intervention, which improves the life quality of patients . This paper reviews the latest techniques of distal radial artery puncture and sheathless guiding catheters in coronary intervention.

参考文献/References:

[1] 白洋,车方远,易文慧,等. 经皮冠脉介入术在中国的发展概况[J]. 心血管病学进展,2018,39(4):516-520.

[2] 高润霖.我国冠心病介入治疗的进展与展望[J].中华心血管病杂志,2019,47(9):675-679.

[3] Amato JJ, Solod E, Cleveland RJ. A "second" radial artery for monitoring the perioperative pediatric cardiac patient[J]. J Pediatr Surg,1977,12(5):715-717.

[4] Babunashvili A, Dundua D. Recanalization and reuse of early occluded radial artery within 6 days after previous transradial diagnostic procedure[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2011,77(4):530-536.

[5] Aladino C,Mariano DS.Anatomical snuffbox and it clinical significance:a literature review[J]. Int J Morphol,2015,33(4):1355-1360.

[6] Corcos T. Distal radial access for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention:a state-of-the-art review[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2019,93(4):639-644.

[7] Davies RE,Gilchrist IC.Back hand approach to radial access:the snuff box approach[J].Cardiovasc Revasc Med,2018,19(3):324-326.

[8] Al-Azizi KM, Grewal V, Gobeil K, et al. The left distal transradial artery access for coronary angiography and intervention: a US experience[J]. Cardiovasc Revasc Med ,2019,20(9):786-789.

[9] Kiemeneij F. Left distal transradial access in the anatomical snuffbox for coronary angiography (ldTRA) and interventions (ldTRI)[J]. EuroIntervention,2017,13(7):851-857.

[10] Kim Y, Jeong MH, Kim MC, et al. Successful percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with recanalized thrombus: saving a radial artery by snuffbox approach[J]. Cardiol J,2019,26(3):292-293.

[11] Kaledin AL, Kochanov IN, Podmetin PS, et al. Distal radial artery in endovascular interventions[DB/OL]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319162208.

[12] Roghani-Dehkordi F, Hashemifard O, Sadeghi M, et al. Distal accesses in the hand (two novel techniques) for percutaneous coronary angiography and intervention[J]. ARYA Atheroscler,2018,14(2):95-100.

[13] McNamara MG, Butler TE, Sanders WE, et al. Ischaemia of the index finger and thumb secondary to thrombosis of the radial artery in the anatomical snuffbox[J]. Hand Surg Br,1998,23(1):28-32.

[14] Koutouzis M, Kontopodis E, Tassopoulos A, et al. Distal versus traditional radial approach for coronary angiography[J]. Cardiovasc Revasc Med,2019,20(8):678-680.

[15] Ziakas A, Koutouzis M, Didagelos M, et al. Right arm distal transradial (snuffbox) access for coronary catheterization:initial experience[J]. Hellenic J Cardiol,2018,Oct 30.pii:S1109-9666(18)30379-8.DOI: 10.1016/j.hjc.2018.10.008[Epub ahead of print].

[16] Mizuguchi Y, Izumikawa T, Hashimoto S, et al. Efficacy and safety of the distal transradial approach in coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: a Japanese multicenter experience[J]. Cardiovasc Interv Ther,2019,May 24. DOI: 10.1007/s12928-019-00590-0 [Epub ahead of print].

[17] Sakai H, Ikeda S, Harada T, et al. Limitations of successive transradial approach in the same arm: the Japanese experience[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2001 ,54(2):204-208.

[18] Coughlan JJ, Zebrauskaite A, Arnous S, et al. Left distal trans-radial access facilitates earlier discharge post-coronary angiography[J]. J Interv Cardiol,2018,31(6):964-968.

[19] Soydan E, Ak?n M. Coronary angiography using the left distal radial approach—An alternative site to conventional radial coronary angiography[J]. Anatol J Cardiol, 2018 ,19(4):243-248.

[20] Yoo BS, Yoon J, Ko JY, et al. Anatomical consideration of the radial artery for transradial coronary procedures: arterial diameter, branching anomaly and vessel tortuosity[J]. Int J Cardiol,2005,101(3):421-427.

[21] Mamas M, D’Souza S, Hendry C, et al. Use of the sheathless guide catheter during routine transradial percutaneous coronary intervention: a feasibility study[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2010 ,75(4):596-602.

[22] García-Blas S, Nú?ez J, Carrillo P, et al. Usefulness of sheathless guide catheter for the percutaneous coronary intervention of left main disease by radial approach[J]. Int J Cardiol ,2016,211:49-52.

[23] Zhao H, Banerjee S, Chen H, et al. Transradial percutaneous coronary intervention for left main bifurcation lesions using 7.5-Fr sheathless guide catheter[J]. Medicine (Baltimore),2018,97(18):e0678.

[24] Sciahbasi A,Mancone M,Cortese B,et al. Transradial percutaneous coronary interventions using sheathless guiding catheters: a multicenter registry[J]. J Interv Cardiol,2011,24(5):407-412.

[25] Mohsen A,Alqasrawi M,Shantha GPS,et al. Comparison of radial artery occlusion following transradial access for percutaneous coronary intervention using sheath-based versus sheathless technique[J]. Sci Rep ,2018,8(1):12026.

[26] Kiemeneij F,Fraser D,Slagboom T,et al. Hydrophilic coating aids radial sheath withdrawal and reduces patient discomfort following transradial coronary intervention: a randomized double-blind comparison of coated and uncoated sheaths[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ,2003,59(2):161-164.

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-08-11